Showing posts with label Ai. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ai. Show all posts

Friday, 28 August 2026

The Sridevi site statistics have skyrocketed. Something is sus....

Something wasn't adding up - so I asked an ai program [Gemini google!] why, our humble little Sridevi fan page, suddenly saw a massive spike in numbers over the past few weeks... 

The Dark Web... Indeed... 



The massive spike!


According to Gemini;

The surge in traffic you are seeing on your blog is a rampant issue across the internet, particularly for niche, archive-rich, or highly detailed websites.

Several AI-related and automated factors explain why an archival blog can suddenly experience massive spikes in hits:

1. Automated AI Web Crawlers & Scrapers

Major AI firms (OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, Perplexity, and independent data brokers) deploy automated scrapers (e.g., GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot). These bots systematically crawl public websites to:

  • Extract text data to train Large Language Models (LLMs).

  • Extract images to train vision models or populate media databases.

  • Perform live web retrieval (RAG) when an AI user asks a question about rare, specific, or historical topics, forcing the AI to scrape exact web sources on demand.

Because archival or niche focus blogs hold deep, specialized information (rare images, verified filmographies, precise dates, scanned collateral), they are high-value targets for data harvesters. Unlike a regular human reader who reads one or two articles, a single scraper hit can trigger hundreds or thousands of automated requests in a matter of minutes as it crawls every page, tag, image file, and historical post.

2. Blogger Analytics Counting Bot Hits

Blogger’s built-in stats counter is notorious for counting raw server requests rather than true human sessions. When an aggressive bot network hits your site to index text or download image assets, Blogger registers every single file request as a page view, causing numbers to jump artificially.

3. "Regurgitation" & Content Theft Concerns

Your instinct that content is being used elsewhere is valid:

  • LLM Knowledge Retrieval: If an AI model ingests specialized biographical details, historical counts, or rare trivia, it will summarize and present that knowledge directly to users on platforms like ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Google AI Overviews—often without sending a click back to your source site.

  • Content Aggregators & Automated Scraping Sites: Automated bot networks often copy text and images directly from Blogger RSS feeds or page structures to auto-populate spam blog networks, social media bot accounts, or image-hosting scrapers.

What You Can Do on Blogger

While Blogger limits server-level access (like running custom firewall scripts), you can take immediate steps to protect your content and clean up your analytics:

Step 1: Check Blogger Analytics Breakdown

Go to your Blogger Dashboard Stats panel:

  1. Look at Referrers and Browsers/Operating Systems.

  2. If you see high volumes coming from unusual locations, missing referrer URLs, or obscure user agents (like Python-urllib, HeadlessChrome, or unknown bots), it confirms non-human traffic.

Step 2: Block AI Scrapers via robots.txt

You can instruct well-behaved AI crawlers (like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Common Crawl) to stop scraping your blog:

  1. Go to Settings > Search preferences (or Errors and redirects / Custom robots.txt).

  2. Enable Custom robots.txt and append rules to disallow major AI scrapers:

Plaintext
User-agent: GPTBot
Disallow: /

User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Disallow: /

User-agent: ClaudeBot
Disallow: /

User-agent: CCBot
Disallow: /

User-agent: Anthropic-ai
Disallow: /

User-agent: PerplexityBot
Disallow: /

(Note: While standard AI scrapers respect robots.txt, rogue scrapers may ignore it, but it effectively cuts off the major LLM harvesters.)

Step 3: Protect Images with Watermarks

If rare or self-edited images are being scraped for re-use elsewhere, adding a subtle, clean watermark (e.g., your blog name or logo) directly onto the image files before uploading ensures that even if an AI vision bot or content aggregator steals the image, your attribution remains permanently intact.



Sunday, 23 August 2026

Fake and real: Sridevi tributes with ai generated fake pics are an abomination



One of these images is fake, and one is real. Can you tell which is which? 

AI can’t. Neither can the new generation of Sridevi fans who are wildly active online and unfamiliar with the original photographs of the actress from the 90s - let alone the 80s! 

What we’re left with is a digital corrosion: clips of clips, images of images - all fakes of Sridevi. The prevailing image of her circulating on social media, especially in those endless birthday tributes, is now an alternative version of Sridevi… but not Sridevi. Funnily enough, even those who personally knew Sridevi, like legendary actress Shabana Aazmi - posted a FAKE picture of Sridevi in her birthday tribute. The sentiment was real, the jpegs were NOT! 





It’s gotten so bad that an upcoming book on Sridevi features a fake portrait on the cover - one that looks more like a distant cousin than the actress herself. A shoddy picture. Talk about judging a book by its cover. We’re already unimpressed... .

Thursday, 2 July 2026

Sridevi with model Deepak Malhotra on the sets of Lamhe: The half fake pic trend


Timeless Indian Melodies on social media (I most often see on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram) is prolific in writing about Hindi cinema and puts up a quasi-real pic; one half of it is real, the other is conjured up by AI. It's so distracting - something is always a bit off. For example, the above pic. Sridevi wasn't wearing jeans, but a denim skirt. The background was different, model turned non-actor Deepak Malhotra's shoes were different. The real pic is below... 

Sridevi's denim and lace embroidered skirt is fully visible in the movie, in a scene with Waheeda Rehman. 

A fake pic - or a half fake pic - is like a half truth. It colours all copy and context, a little bit of trust fades with it. 





Saturday, 27 June 2026

Sridevi in 1989: Sridevi according to AI in 2026: The cultural damage of image modification


Photo editing is a skill - and ai machinery that's "fixing", resurrecting, colour correcting... is putting a generic stamp and impossible beauty standard on women and the slop is erasing women for the natural beauty and flaws and fabulousity. Sridevi's original photos ai corrected is an over correction. To such a point, the post-edited photo looks nothing like the original icon that Sridevi was.... which brings me to the latest rant of the day;

The Erosion of Authenticity: How AI Photo Editing is Undermining Cultural Icons

Fasten your seat-belts, its going to be a bumpy ride.

Photo editing has long been a skilled craft - one that respects light, composition, and the soul of the subject. Today’s AI “restoration,” colour correction, and “enhancement” tools, however, function more like blunt instruments of homogenisation. They stamp faces with a generic, poreless, impossibly symmetrical beauty standard that flattens individuality. What gets erased is not merely technical imperfection but the very essence of natural beauty: the expressive asymmetries, lived-in lines, distinctive features, and charismatic flaws that made icons unforgettable. The result is visual slop — technically polished, culturally hollow.

Take Sridevi, the legendary Indian actress whose magnetic screen presence defined an era. Her original photographs capture a vibrant, singular face: the sharp expressiveness of her eyes, the particular curve of her smile, her bulbous nose that somehow was a source of constant chagrin to only her - no one else - the energy that radiated from her bone structure and expressions. AI “corrections” of these images often go far beyond dust removal or colour balancing. They smooth, reshape, and re-proportion her features until the woman staring back barely resembles the icon millions adored. The over-correction doesn’t honour her - it replaces her with a generic template of contemporary attractiveness, what (often Western) ideals of beauty standards that obfuscate original identity into a mass produced reserve of Barbie-fication. The fabulousity born of her specific humanity disappears.

This pattern repeats across yesteryear stars. AI systems, trained predominantly on current beauty trends and filtered social media imagery, systematically diminish the very characteristics that gave actors cultural weight: a crooked smile that conveyed mischief, a prominent nose that lent gravitas, skin texture that told stories of age and experience, or eyes whose unique shape conveyed emotion with precision. These traits weren’t flaws; they were signatures. By erasing them, AI severs the visual link between the public and the performer’s authentic self.

In another decade (if not sooner), the damage may become irreversible. Future generations will encounter “restored” archives of Marilyn Monroe, Audrey Hepburn, MGR, or Sridevi that look like smoothed avatars rather than real people. The cultural significance of these icons - rooted in their tangible, flawed, human presence - will dilute into shadow versions of themselves. Historical memory itself risks distortion: we will remember not who they were, but what an algorithm decided they should have been.

Preserving original photographs, unedited or lightly and transparently restored, is therefore an act of cultural stewardship. Authenticity carries emotional truth. When we let AI overwrite that truth with generic perfection, we don’t just lose pixels - we lose the irreplaceable texture of human stardom.




Friday, 13 March 2026

Fake fake fake: AI modified images of Bollywood stars go wild online: Aishwarya Rai, Sridevi, Janhvi Kapoor etc forged online



 

The problem with AI altered or enhanced imagery is of course that despite its intentions, some of these images look nothing like the real actress. The nose is altered, the eyes enhanced, the skin smoothened beyond natural human reality, the lip shape perfected, one tweak after another and soon, the original is lost altogether. Soon fakes of fakes will prolifer and by the end, the avatar of Sridevi will look nothing like the real Sridevi. 

That's the trouble with good intentions; its paved all the way to hell.

Tuesday, 20 January 2026

Bollywood actresses and leading ladies all lined up: Pity its fake as fk...



Ah the generative artificial portrait of Indian actresses all sari-clad and lined up like the high school yearbook photo call of the best of the best of the 90s and early 2000s. Pity its so darned fake... 

From the top; Shilpa Shetty, Urmila Matondkar, Manisha Koirala, Sonali Bendre, Kajol. 

Seated, from left to right, Karisma Kapoor, Raveena Tandon, Madhuri Dixit, Sridevi and Juhi Chawla. 

Apart from Filmfare awards (before it lost is lustre) no one else could have gotten these ladies within a square mile of each other. As the Indian film industry gets more corporate, divisive, separate, self-serving... the collective barely turns up for the other. Think of every awards show --and now there are soooo many-- when you can look out at the audience and predict who the winners are -- they are all dutifully informed well in advance and the nominees are a no-show. Why bother to support colleagues or the fraternity?! 

Now I'm not one to be nostalgic of a past that didn't exist, but as retro images on Instagram show, there were definitely more parties, events and celebrations when the industry turned up for each other - without sponsorship or a dangling award at the end of a stick... 

As there is nothing more constant than change in the industry, let's see what it morphs into in the coming decade. 



Thursday, 4 December 2025

The cast of Chaalbaaz: Sridevi's tour-de-force elevated the oft told tale!

Though Sridevi won the award and accolades, the 1989 double-role dramedy worked in its entirety because of its stellar cast that propelled Chaalbaaz to box office success; Sunny Deol, Rajinikanth, Anupam Kher, Rohini Hattangadi, Aftab Shivdasani, Annu Kapoor, Aruna Irani.

There's a memorable cameo by Kader Khan, as the not-so-blind beggar, Johnny Lever as Baba and the comedian who played the banker... whose name I always forget!

The film released in Dec 1989 ie 36 years ago! 

The movie has aged well - its sort of staggering how great Sridevi is and so incredibly watchable. Clips of it are trending on social media three and a half decades later. 

The story is old hat. Well, vintage wine, new bottle. Done before as Ram aur Shyam, Seetha aur Geetha - and later Kishen Kanhayia. There are some lofty ambitions to make the movie again in its later avatar for the modern age but... where are the takers? And where's the talent?! 

  • Our massive Chaalbaaz archive here
  • Sridevi with Sunny Deol over the years here.
  • Sridevi with Rajinikanth over the years here

Monday, 16 June 2025

Sridevi: the AI version


Its slightly bone-chilling how real AI image trickery is getting... 

These classic pictures of Sridevi in motion thanks to tech... So frightening of what lies ahead as history will be re-written as pure fiction. 

Saturday, 12 April 2025

Sridevi and family get the Ghibli treatment!




Sridevi and family get the Ghibli treatment! If you're wondering if the bearded fella was Arjun Kapoor - it wasn't! 

When "normal" people get the Ghibli treatment, they look better and cuter - Sridevi was waaaaay cuter IRL than her cartoon version!




Friday, 15 September 2023

Monday, 11 September 2023

Sridevi AI: Artificial... Intent?





Sridevi's viral AI reworked images, set to the slowed tempo of a Lamhe song is trending on social media. On one hand, its a fan tribute to the late icon, pixelated fan fiction, a cyber program that has envision Sridevi, a digital programmer/artist's vision of how they'd like to see Sridevi had she lived longer than her curtailed 54-year life. 

A technicolour life of 50 years on film that faded to black suddenly one fateful February night... and this digital incarnation, revived through artificial means, may begin innocently enough, but the potential for a black mirror version is ripe for the picking. 

If you think a bit more about it, its bone-chilling as the rights to the image and visual depiction of Sridevi, open to an interpretation that she-or her family-would/would not like is a pandora's box that has been opened. 

When its respectful and a tribute, sure, perhaps the collective Ayappans/Kapoors/the fervid fanclub would be Ok with it... but as we all know, the internet has a dark side, an amoral abyss filled with infinite unknowable possibilities. What happens when the likeness of an actor is not trademarked or protected from nefarious interests? 

All Bollywood stars need a wake-up all; their likeness and legacy is at risk. 

There was a time when I'd shoot slings and arrows on Twitter to the false stories that are calcified on the net as the accepted truth, but even I got exhausted. The number of books, blogs, YouTube clips, newsbytes that have engendered falsehoods about Sridevi... how do we reconcile and rectify it? A lie travels the world while the truth is still putting shoes on... 

Now that the visual world is now open to such infinite falsehoods, what's coming down the pike? 

I don't know what lies [pun intended] ahead....